US regulators flag concerns over big banks' 'living wills'

Four of America's largest banks have been ordered by US regulators to strengthen their plans for potential bankruptcy, with Citigroup facing particularly severe criticism.

The Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have instructed Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase to refine their 'living wills' - detailed plans outlining how they could safely unwind in the event of a financial crisis. The regulators specifically highlighted the need for improved strategies to manage the banks' vast derivatives portfolios, which hold trillions of dollars in notional value.

In a notable development, the FDIC escalated its concerns about Citigroup's plan to a 'deficiency', deeming it not credible. However, the Federal Reserve did not concur with this assessment, sparing Citigroup from potential additional regulatory restrictions or forced divestitures.

Citigroup's issues stem from weaknesses in its data and controls, leading to inaccurate calculations of liquidity and capital requirements for unwinding derivatives positions. The bank has been grappling with regulatory concerns over its data management for several years.

In response, Citigroup stated: "We are fully committed to addressing the issues identified by our regulators. While we've made substantial progress on our transformation, we've acknowledged that we have had to accelerate our work in certain areas, including improving data quality and regulatory processes."

The banks are required to outline their plans to address these shortcomings by September, with detailed improvements to be included in their next living will submissions in 2025.

This regulatory scrutiny comes in the wake of Credit Suisse's collapse last year, which raised questions about the effectiveness of such resolution plans. Consequently, regulators are now demanding that banks address contingency planning and consider necessary actions from foreign governments in their plans.

Notably, regulators did not identify problems in the plans submitted by Wells Fargo & Co, Bank of New York Mellon, State Street, or Morgan Stanley.

As the banking sector continues to navigate complex regulatory landscapes, these developments underscore the ongoing challenges in ensuring the stability and resilience of major financial institutions.



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Sanctions evasion in an era of conflict: Optimising KYC and monitoring to tackle crime
The ongoing war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions on Russia, and the continuing geopolitical tensions have resulted in an unprecedented increase in parties added to sanctions lists.

Achieving operational resilience in the financial sector: Navigating DORA with confidence
Operational resilience has become crucial for financial institutions navigating today's digital landscape riddled with cyber risks and challenges. The EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) provides a harmonised framework to address these complexities, but there are key factors that financial institutions must ensure they consider.

Legacy isn’t the enemy: what FSIs can do to keep their systems up and running
In this webinar we will examine some of the steps FSIs have already taken to rigorously monitor and test systems – both manually and with AI-powered automation – while satisfying the concerns of regulators and customers.

Optimising digital banking: Unifying communications for seamless CX
In the digital age, financial institutions risk falling behind their rivals if they fail to unite fragmented communications ecosystems to deliver seamless, personalised customer experiences.

This FStech webinar sponsored by Precisely explores vital strategies to optimise cross-channel messaging through omnichannel orchestration and real-time customer data access.