BIS warns AI should not take over from central banks when making important decisions

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has warned that AI should not take over from central banks when making important decisions such as interest rates.

Hyun Song Shin, the BIS’s head of research and top economic adviser, said policymakers should not view AI as "something magical".

The report by the BIS discussed how AI can be used to help central banks predict inflation and other economic variables by sifting through data to identify potential financial system vulnerabilities, including the risk of future recessions.

But the report also pointed towards how some AI models sometimes struggle to explain their decisions and also have a tendency to sometimes “hallucinate” data.

The report also touched on how becoming dependent on a relatively small number of AI model providers, due to the high costs of developing these advanced models, may create third-party dependency risks involving tech partners.

It also discussed how cyberattacks could be used to attack these AI models, explaining how for example a “data poisoning” attack could be used to maliciously tamper with the data a central bank AI model is trained with.

The BIS also pointed out how central banks leaning too heavily on AI could also be at risk of making biased decisions against certain groups if the models are trained based on biased information.

The BIS said its Innovation Hub is testing AI's capabilities in several areas together with its central bank partners.

“Central banks were early adopters of machine learning and are therefore well positioned to make the most of AI's ability to impose structure on vast troves of unstructured data,” Cecilia Skingsley, head of the BIS Innovation Hub. “For example, Project Aurora explores how to detect money laundering activities from payments data and Project Raven uses AI to enhance cyber resilience, to mention just two from our portfolio.”



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Safeguarding economies: DNFBPs' role in AML and CTF compliance explained
Join FStech editor Jonathan Easton, NICE Actimize's Adam McLaughlin and Graham Mackenzie of the Law Society of Scotland as they look at the role Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs) play in the financial sector, and the challenges they face in complying with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regulations.

Ransomware and beyond: Enhancing cyber threat awareness in the financial sector
Join FStech editor Jonathan Easton and Proofpoint cybersecurity strategist Matt Cooke as they discuss the findings of the State of the Phish 2023 report, diving into key topics such as awareness of cyber threats, the sophisticated techniques being used by criminals to target the financial sector, and how financial institutions can take a proactive approach to educating both their employees and their customers.

Click here to read the 2023 State of the Phish report from Proofpoint.

Cracking down on fraud
In this webinar a panel of expert speakers explored the ways in which high-volume PSPs and FinTechs are preventing fraud while providing a seamless customer experience.

Future of Planning, Budgeting, Forecasting, and Reporting
Sage Intacct is excited to present FSN The Modern Finance Forum’s “Future of Planning, Budgeting, Forecasting, and Reporting Global Survey 2022” results. With participation from 450 companies around the globe, the survey results highlight how organisations are developing their core financial processes by 2030.